Urbanrise Gattahalli Price
There is no price for this project. For cost discipline in the same Bengaluru market, Abhee Bellary Road helps readers stay focused on total payable value rather than treating the quoted base number as the full answer.
Not a soft price, not a pre-launch price, not an indicative price. Urbanrise has published nothing — no per-square-foot rate, no configuration price list, no payment plan, no launch offer. The developer has not published the project itself. Urbanrise's own Bengaluru portfolio page lists Ecospace at Electronic City Phase 2, Codename Gold Standard on Sarjapur Road, Kanakapura Road, Whitefield and Jigani Hobli, along with unnamed Jakkur and Hennur entries. There is no Gattahalli project on it. A developer that has not announced a project has not priced one.
The client workbook we were given for this development contains a pricing tab. It is an unfilled template — no rates, no configuration prices, no payment schedule, nothing populated. It is the same blank tab that arrives on every intake sheet of this kind. We are recording that plainly rather than treating an empty template as though it were withheld information. When budget pressure is the real filter, TVS Emerald RR Nagar helps keep the same-city shortlist focused on total payable cost, payment milestones, interiors, and the buffer a buyer should keep aside.
So this page does not carry a price, and it does not carry a range presented as this project's price. What it carries instead is the evidence that does exist about what homes cost in this part of the Sarjapur–Attibele belt, sorted by how much weight each piece of evidence can actually bear, plus an account of the costs that sit on top of any quoted rate in Karnataka. That is a less satisfying answer than a number. It is the only honest one available on 27 August 2026.
Urbanrise Gattahalli is the working title used on this site. Urbanrise has not announced a marketing name for the development.
Why Urbanrise Gattahalli has no price: the project sits at the approvals stage
The reason there is no price is not commercial reticence. It is that the scheme is not yet at a stage where a price can lawfully be quoted.
| What exists | Status |
|---|---|
| Environmental application SIA/KA/INFRA2/583353/2026 | Filed 7 July 2026, under verification |
| Category | B2, activity 8(a) Building / Construction |
| Environmental clearance | Not granted |
| Terms of Reference | Not granted |
| K-RERA registration | None, and no pending application |
| Promoter of record | Alliance Grandeur Homes Private Limited |
The environmental application was filed on 7 July 2026 and is under verification. No environmental clearance has been granted, and the project is not registered with K-RERA. Nothing about this scheme has been approved, cleared or sanctioned.
That second fact governs everything on this page. Under Section 3 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, a project falling in a registrable class cannot lawfully be advertised, marketed, booked or sold until the Authority has granted registration. Karnataka's registry carries no entry for this promoter. So a rate quoted to you today for homes at Gattahalli — by anyone, in any form, however soft the framing — is not a lawful offer, and no amount paid against it is a booking that RERA recognises. This microsite is an information and enquiry resource for a scheme at the approvals stage. It is not a booking channel and it does not accept or forward money.
There is a second consequence worth stating. Because registration has not happened, none of the protections that attach to a registered project attach to anything agreed now: there is no registered agreement for sale in the prescribed form, no obligation to keep a statutorily defined proportion of collections in a separate project account, and no declared completion date the promoter can be held to. A pre-registration discount, if one is ever offered, is compensation for giving those up. Price it that way.
How we tier the price evidence at Gattahalli
Most price pages for pre-launch projects blur every source into a single confident-sounding number. The sources are not equal, and the gap between them is very wide. Here is the ladder we apply, best evidence first.
| Tier | What it is | What we have for this project |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The developer's own published price for this project | Nothing. Urbanrise has not published the project. |
| 2 | A signed or registered document — a RERA-declared rate, a registered sale deed, the state guidance value for the survey number | Nothing published. No K-RERA registration, so no declared rates. Guidance value for Sy. No. 50 is checkable at the sub-registrar but we publish no figure we have not read. |
| 3 | Another developer's own published rate for a named project in the same corridor | This is the strongest evidence that exists. It is set out below. |
| 4 | An aggregator or portal "average rate for the locality" | We publish none. |
| 5 | A channel partner or broker quote | We publish none. |
The distinction between tier 3 and tier 4 is the one that matters most, and it is the one most often collapsed. A developer's own published rate table is a specific company committing, in public and under its own name, to a number for a specific building it is selling. A portal's "average price in Gattahalli" is a derived statistic — an arithmetic mean over whatever listings a portal happened to hold, including duplicate listings, aspirational asks, resale stock of a different vintage, and plots priced on an entirely different basis. The two look alike on a page. They are not remotely alike as evidence. We use tier 3 and we decline to reproduce tier 4 at all.
Tier 5 deserves its own warning here. A pre-launch project with no registration and no published price is precisely the situation in which channel-partner quotes circulate most freely, because nothing exists to contradict them. If a number reaches you attached to this project, ask which of the five rows above it comes from. On present evidence the only truthful answer is row five.
Corridor rates in the Sarjapur–Attibele belt
The site is at Sy. No. 50, Gattahalli Village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk. The nearest developer-grade published rates we can source in this corridor belong to Modern Spaaces, which maps rates for its Sarjapur-corridor apartment projects on its own website. These figures were read on 27 August 2026.
| Project (Modern Spaaces) | Published rate, Rs per sq ft |
|---|---|
| Onyx | 6,473 – 6,502 |
| Neon | 6,494 – 7,276 |
| Green Storeys | 7,023 – 7,265 |
| Engrace Vista | 8,459 – 8,500 |
| Serene Heights 1 | 9,212 – 9,241 |
Read the caveats before you read the numbers.
These are a different developer's projects. Every one of them sits 5 to 10 km away from Gattahalli, which in this part of Bengaluru is a different micro-market with different access, different jurisdiction and different infrastructure. They are corridor context — evidence about the belt — and they are explicitly not comparables for an Urbanrise product.
The spread inside one developer's own table is the most instructive thing about it. The bottom of the range is Rs 6,473 per sq ft and the top is Rs 9,241 per sq ft. INFERRED (our arithmetic): 9,241 − 6,473 = 2,768, and 9,241 ÷ 6,473 = 1.43. One developer, one corridor, and the premium product is priced at roughly 1.43 times the entry product. Anyone quoting you a single "Sarjapur Road rate" is averaging across a spread that wide.
Note also that the three lower-priced projects cluster tightly: Onyx, Neon and Green Storeys together span Rs 6,473 to Rs 7,276 per sq ft. Engrace Vista and Serene Heights 1 sit well clear of that cluster, in a separate premium tier.
The reference band we will publish, and the number we will not
Here is where we stop short of what a price page is normally expected to do, and why.
We can defensibly publish a ceiling-side reference band. We cannot defensibly publish a price estimate for this project.
INFERRED — reference band, and it is an estimate about the corridor, not a price for this project. Taking the three lower-tier products from the table above and pooling their ranges: the minimum is Onyx at Rs 6,473 and the maximum is Neon at Rs 7,276, giving a pooled band of Rs 6,473 to Rs 7,276 per sq ft, midpoint Rs 6,875. We deliberately exclude Engrace Vista and Serene Heights 1 from the band. Those two are the same developer's premium products, and carrying the band up to Rs 9,241 would import a positioning this project has given no indication of taking.
That band is a reasonable answer to the question "what does mainstream apartment stock in this belt cost, on evidence we can point at". It is not an answer to "what will Urbanrise charge at Gattahalli", and we will not convert it into one. The reason is specific rather than defensive. Urbanrise is a volume developer with a reputation for aggressive pricing; Modern Spaaces is a smaller, design-led builder. A volume developer's product in this corridor would reasonably be expected to sit at or below the lower cluster rather than inside it. But "below by how much" is a number nothing in our sources supports, and manufacturing one would be the exact failure this page exists to avoid. So we publish the ceiling side and leave the floor open.
If you take one figure away from this section, take this: on sourced evidence, there is no basis for expecting this project to be priced above the Rs 7,276 per sq ft top of the lower cluster, and no sourced basis for naming a specific rate below it.
What the environmental filing says about cost, and why it is not a price
The filing carries a cost figure, and it is regularly misread as a price. It is not one.
| Filed figure | Value |
|---|---|
| Declared project cost | Rs 223.80 crore |
| Residential units | 368 |
| Built-up area | 79,634.39 sq m |
| Land | 4.20 acres (1.6996 ha) |
| Floors | 2BF + GF + 18UF; club house 2BF + GF + 2UF |
Three pieces of arithmetic follow, all of them ours, all of them estimates.
INFERRED — declared cost per home. Rs 223.80 crore ÷ 368 units = Rs 60,81,522, or about Rs 60.8 lakh per home.
INFERRED — declared cost per square foot of filed built-up area. 79,634.39 sq m × 10.7639 = about 857,177 sq ft. Rs 223.80 crore ÷ 857,177 sq ft = about Rs 2,610 per sq ft.
INFERRED — filed built-up area per home. 857,177 sq ft ÷ 368 units = about 2,329 sq ft per home.
Now the caution, which matters more than the numbers.
The "project cost" field on an environmental application is a declared capital cost submitted for regulatory appraisal. The filing does not itemise what it covers, so we cannot tell you whether it includes the land, financing, marketing or the developer's margin, and we will not guess. It is not a sale price, it is not a floor for one, and dividing it by the unit count does not produce a home's cost of construction.
The built-up area figure carries the same trap in reverse. The 79,634.39 sq m is the whole envelope submitted for clearance: two basement levels of parking, the ground floor, eighteen upper floors, plus a club house of two basements, ground and two upper levels. That is not saleable apartment area and it is certainly not carpet area. Set the filed 2,329 sq ft per home against the client brief's tentative saleable band of 1,100 to 1,615 sq ft and the difference is roughly 714 to 1,229 sq ft per home of parking, club house, cores, corridors and services. That gap is exactly why you cannot back a per-square-foot sale rate out of a regulatory filing, and why anyone who claims to have done so has made an error.
The tentative configurations, and why we attach no price to them
The client brief carries a configuration table. It labels itself tentative, and we treat it as what it is.
| Configuration | Area stated in the brief, sq ft | Register |
|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 1,100 – 1,250 | UNCONFIRMED — the client brief's own tentative figure |
| 3 BHK | 1,300 – 1,615 | UNCONFIRMED — the client brief's own tentative figure |
The brief describes these as tentative in its own words. No Urbanrise or Alliance source confirms them, the environmental filing does not break the 368 units down by configuration, and there is no approved plan in the public record against which to check them. Multiplying an unconfirmed area by an unsourced rate produces a number with two independent errors compounded into it, presented with the confidence of arithmetic. We do not publish configuration prices for this project.
The Karnataka cost stack: what sits on top of any quoted rate
Whenever this project is priced, the headline per-square-foot number will not be what leaves your account. In Karnataka the stack above a base rate has a consistent shape, and it is worth understanding before a cost sheet is ever put in front of you.
Statutory charges, payable to the state, not the developer
- Stamp duty on the instrument of transfer, levied under the Karnataka Stamp Act on the higher of the consideration and the government guidance value for the property. The applicable rate is slab-based on that value and is revised from time to time. We publish no percentage here because we publish only figures we can source, and a stale rate on a price page is worse than none. Confirm the slab in force with the jurisdictional sub-registrar at the time of registration.
- Registration fee, charged separately from stamp duty on the same base.
- Cess and surcharge riding on the stamp duty, which vary by whether the property falls in a corporation, municipal or panchayat area. That is directly relevant here — see the jurisdiction section below.
- GST, which applies to the sale of an under-construction residential unit but not to a completed unit sold after the occupancy certificate. The applicable rate and the input-credit position depend on how the unit is classified. Ask for the rate and the classification in writing.
Developer charges, usually itemised separately from the base rate
Floor rise. Preferential location charges. Covered car parking. Club house or amenity charges, which on a scheme with a two-basement, ground-plus-two club house are unlikely to be nominal. Electricity and water connection deposits and BESCOM charges. Sinking fund and corpus. Advance maintenance, typically demanded for a fixed number of months at handover. Khata transfer and legal or documentation charges.
What a quoted rate does and does not include
A rate quoted per square foot is almost always quoted on super built-up area — your apartment plus a loaded share of common areas — not on carpet area. RERA requires carpet area to be stated in a registered agreement precisely because the two diverge so widely. Until this project is registered, no such disclosure obligation is in force. When a rate finally appears, the first question is not "how much" but "per square foot of what".
Why we publish no worked example
It is tempting to multiply a configuration by a rate and show a reader "what a home would cost". We do not do it here, and the reason is the one set out above: the only areas available are the client brief's self-labelled tentative bands, and the only rates available belong to a different developer's projects several kilometres away. Multiplying one by the other compounds two independent errors into a single confident-looking rupee figure, and a figure like that survives every caveat attached to it — it gets screenshotted, quoted and negotiated against long after the caveat has been forgotten. No price for Urbanrise Gattahalli exists, and this page publishes none.
What is worth understanding without any number attached is the shape of the stack. Several of the charges listed above are quoted as lump sums rather than as a percentage of the base consideration — car parking, club house charges, connection deposits, corpus and sinking fund, khata and documentation. Because they do not scale down with a smaller apartment, they fall proportionally harder on compact units than on large ones. When a cost sheet finally appears, ask for every line itemised and identify which of them are fixed before comparing any headline rate with another project's.
Site facts that should move the number in either direction
When a rate does eventually appear, these are the verified facts to weigh it against.
Density is high. INFERRED: 368 homes ÷ 4.20 acres = 87.6 homes per acre. That is dense for the corridor and it is a legitimate reason for a rate to sit lower than for a lower-density scheme on comparable land. It also has implications for open space, parking circulation and lift waiting that a cost sheet will not mention.
The club house is a real commitment. The filing records a club house at two basement levels, ground, and two upper floors. On a 4.20-acre site that is a substantial dedicated amenity building rather than a converted floor plate, and it is a genuine cost the developer is carrying. Expect it to appear as a separate charge on the cost sheet, and expect it to be defended.
The access road is narrow. The client brief states that access is direct from the 9 m Gattahalli Main Road. The exact width is the brief's claim and we cannot verify it, but the point stands: for 368 homes plus a club house, that is a narrow approach. Access quality is priced into resale whether or not it is priced into the launch.
The jurisdiction is not BBMP, and this affects your money. A point-in-polygon test of the corrected site centroid against the official Greater Bengaluru Authority boundary places the site outside it, about 2.8 km east of the nearest edge, in the BMRDA planning region under Anekal jurisdiction. Buyers should expect panchayat khata and panchayat property tax rather than BBMP A-khata, and should confirm the khata classification on the specific survey number before purchase. This is a price-relevant fact, not a technicality: khata classification affects the cess and surcharge slab, the property tax you pay annually, and — critically — which lenders will fund the purchase. Before paying anything, get written confirmation from your bank that it will lend against the khata classification attaching to this survey number.
The metro connection is real but it is a drive. The nearest operational metro station is Delta Electronics Bommasandra on Namma Metro's Yellow Line, which has been carrying passengers since August 2025. It is 7.96 km by road from the site. That is a genuine running connection and it distinguishes this location from much of the surrounding belt. It is not walking distance and this site is not metro-adjacent. Treat any premium justified on metro proximity with that eight-kilometre figure in hand.
Employment is close. TCS Think Campus and Wipro SEZ are each 5.65 km by road; Infosys Foundation at Konappana Agrahara is 6.80 km; Electronic City is 8.24 km. Carmelaram railway station is 7.18 km by road. Edenbridge International School is 1.55 km. These are the demand fundamentals a rate will be built on.
What to demand in the cost sheet at launch
When this project is registered and priced, ask for all of the following in writing before any payment. A developer that will not put these on paper is telling you something.
- The K-RERA registration number, and the project's page on the Karnataka authority's own portal — not a number on a brochure.
- The rate, and the area basis for it. Per square foot of carpet area or of super built-up area, stated explicitly, with the loading factor between the two given as a number.
- The carpet area of your specific unit, as it will appear in the registered agreement for sale.
- A fully itemised cost sheet: base consideration, floor rise, preferential location charges, parking, club house, corpus, sinking fund, advance maintenance, connection deposits, legal and documentation, each as a separate line with its own figure.
- The statutory line separately: stamp duty, registration fee, cess and surcharge, and GST, each shown as its own amount, with the base each is calculated on identified.
- The guidance value for the survey number, so you can see whether stamp duty is being calculated on the consideration or on a higher guidance figure.
- The khata classification on the title documents for Sy. No. 50, in writing, plus your lender's written confirmation that it will fund against that classification.
- The payment schedule tied to construction milestones, with the completion date as declared to K-RERA.
- Confirmation of the environmental clearance status — as at the date of this page, the application filed on 7 July 2026 remains under verification and nothing has been granted.
Where this page stands
No price exists for Urbanrise Gattahalli. The developer has not published one, the workbook we hold has an empty pricing tab, and the project cannot lawfully be advertised, booked or sold until K-RERA registration is granted, which has not happened. The strongest price evidence available is one neighbouring developer's own published rate table for projects 5 to 10 km away, from which we derive a corridor reference band of Rs 6,473 to Rs 7,276 per sq ft as a ceiling-side estimate and nothing more. Everything else on this page is either a verified figure from the environmental filing, our own arithmetic with the working shown, or a caveat.
We will publish a rate for this project when Urbanrise publishes one, and not before. If you are shown a number in the meantime, the useful question is which row of the evidence ladder it came from.
Urbanrise Gattahalli Pricing — frequently asked questions
There is no price. The developer has published no rate, no starting price and no payment plan for this project, and we will not invent one. Our own listing carries price as "on request" and availability as pre-order for exactly that reason. This is not coyness on the developer's part; a project that is not registered with K-RERA cannot lawfully be marketed or booked, so there is nothing for a price to attach to yet. If a channel partner quotes you a firm per-square-foot rate for this address today, ask them to show you the document it comes from, and note carefully what they are unable to produce.
No confirmed marketing name exists. The client workbook circulating for this site is filenamed "Urbanrise Gattahalli (Urbanrise living by the wave)", but no Urbanrise or Alliance Group source confirms that name for this project, and we will not present it as the announced name. There is a specific hazard here. Urbanrise verifiably recycles campaign codenames across cities, and one such codename belonging to a Chennai-region project is already being mis-attached by aggregators to a Bengaluru address. Adopting a borrowed campaign name would quietly attach this page to a different project in a different state. Urbanrise Gattahalli is the working title used on this site; Urbanrise has not announced a marketing name for the development.
No. Nothing has been granted. The environmental application was filed on 7 July 2026 and its status is UNDER VERIFICATION. There is no state file number, no certificate, no Terms of Reference and no Environmental Clearance on the record. There is also no K-RERA registration. A filed application is a request, not a permission, and the distinction is the whole point of this page. You can check the position yourself on the national PARIVESH portal under proposal number SIA/KA/INFRA2/583353/2026, with single-window reference SW/287832/2026 and CAF/273411/2026, where the issuing authority is the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority. We will not write "approved", "cleared" or "sanctioned" about this project, and we would encourage you to read any material that does with real suspicion.
No, and the confusion is common enough to be worth spelling out. A Terms of Reference, where one is issued, is a scoping instruction handed to an applicant at the start of the appraisal process. It tells the promoter what studies to run and what to submit. It confers no permission to build anything. An Environmental Clearance is the decision at the end of that process. Marketing material sometimes presents a ToR as though it were the clearance, because both arrive as official-looking documents from the same authority. In this project's case the point is academic: no ToR has been issued either. The file sits at verification, which is the stage before appraisal.
The promoter of record is Alliance Grandeur Homes Private Limited. That is the entity name that appears on the environmental application, and it is the name a buyer should expect to see on any allotment letter, agreement or receipt connected with this site. Brand names and legal entities are not the same thing. "Urbanrise" is the marketing brand; Alliance Grandeur Homes Private Limited is the company that would carry the obligations. If a document you are shown names a different company for this survey number, that discrepancy is worth resolving before anything else, and it is the sort of thing a property advocate settles in an afternoon.
Enquire about Urbanrise Gattahalli
Urbanrise Gattahalli is at the stage where the useful thing is information rather than a booking, because there is no lawful booking to make. Leave your details and we will tell you when the position changes — when a Karnataka RERA number is issued, when the environmental file moves, and when the developer publishes a price, a floor plate and an amenity schedule. The enquiry form asks for a name, phone number, email address and message; name and phone are required.